Peggy Shapiro writes about Israels Disproportionate Response for the Amercian Thinker Blog:
Two jumbo jets carrying more than 220 doctors, nurses, civil engineers, and other Israeli army personnel, including a rescue team and field hospital, were among the first rescue teams to arrive in Haiti. In fact, they were the first foreign backup team to set up medical treatment at the partially collapsed main hospital in Port-au-Prince…
[By way of comparison] The U.S. has pledged 100 million and sent supplies and personnel. The U.K. pledged $10 million and sent 64 firemen and 8 volunteers.China, a country with a population of 1,325,639,982 compared to Israel’s 7.5 million sent 50 rescuers and seven journalists. The 25 Arab League nations sent nothing.
Anyway, the title for the article got me to thinking about the whole issue of “proportionate response.” Every time Gazans attack Israeli civilians, the world complains of Israel’s “disproportionate response.” (As if France, for example, would hold back if Luxembourg started lobbing missiles at French civilians!)
Here’s what I’ve come up with. Every time Gaza fires one of those poorly-constructed, badly-aimed rickety rockets at civilian targets in Israel, Israel should respond by firing a poorly-constructed, badly-aimed rickety rocket at civilian targets in Gaza. The rockets should be as similar as possible in design to the Gaza rockets, and the number should always exactly equal the number fired from Gaza.
Of course Israel would have to announce this new strategy before implementing it, and make it explicitly clear that the intent is to address complaints of disproportionality. Then the international community will stop complaining about Israel trying to defend itself.
Right?
Not a chance! The international press doesn’t even report these attacks anymore, unless there’s a violent Israeli response. But the rocket attacks haven’t stopped, as these well-documented Wikipedia articles make clear:


